Richard III body infected with roundworms, say University of Leicester archaeologists

By Culture24 Reporter | 04 September 2013

Samples from the pelvis of Richard III show that the King was infected with parasitic roundworms in his intestines likely to have been caused by contaminated water or soil, according to experts investigating the King’s body with powerful microscopes.

A photo of a skeleton from an archaeological dig in a pit next to a measuring stick
© University of Leicester
Multiple eggs would have hatched into larvae, migrated through the medieval ruler’s tissues and matured in the lungs before crawling up his airways to be re-swallowed, growing into adult worms of up to a foot long once they were back in the intestines.

“Our results show that Richard was infected with roundworms in his intestines, although no other species of intestinal parasite were present in the samples we studied,” said Dr Piers Mitchell, who led the research at the University of Cambridge’s Department of Archaeology and Anthropology.

“We would expect nobles of this period to have eaten meats such as beef, pork, and fish regularly, but there was no evidence for the eggs of the beef, pork, or fish tapeworm.

“Roundworm is spread by the faecal contamination of food by dirty hands, or use of faeces as a crop fertiliser.

“This finding might suggest that his food was cooked thoroughly, which would have prevented the transmission of these parasites.”

Despite being rare in Britain, the spread of roundworm infection globally – where it is thought to affect up to a quarter of the worldwide population – makes it one of the most common afflictions in the world today.

You might also like:

Richard III: The Royal Armouries' Bob Woosnam-Savage on the violent death of the King in battle

University of Leicester archaeologists bid farewell to Grey Friars site of Richard III body

Richard III: Archaeologist Claire Calver on the search for the King's body in Leicester
Latest comment: >Make a comment
Inaccurate reporting, the eggs were not found in the pelvis, but in the soil underneath where the pelvis was.
>See all comments
  • Back to top
  • | Print this article
  • | Email this article
  • | Bookmark and Share
    Back to article
    Your comment:
    DISCLAIMER: Reader comments posted at are the opinion of the comment writer, not Culture24. Culture24 reserves the right to withdraw or withhold from publication any comments that are deemed to be hearsay or potentially libellous, or make false or unsubstantiated allegations or are deemed to be spam or unrelated to the article at which they are posted.